|
Creating space
Four who design area neighborhoods
and homes look at
what we're moving toward
By Jim Wasserman - Bee Staff Writer
The way a metropolitan region looks, with
its office high-rises and shopping centers, and especially its houses,
starts with visions at architectural firms.
When builders craft suburban homes or
five-story condos, it's the architects and building designers who give
them the look that stands for decades.
Always, it's open for debate, scorned as
sprawl or admired as a beautiful place to call home. Even experts argue
vigorously on the emerging landscape of how we live.
Four local practitioners recently met with
The Bee to talk about our houses and how they're changing, about the
role of the TV and a trend to smaller homes. They talked about global
warming and classic older neighborhoods and what they think of the
landscape they are creating.
They are: Vance Graham, partner at El
Dorado Hills-based GBH Partners; Alicia Moniz, owner of
Sacramento-based Moniz Architecture; John Packowski, marketing
principal of PHA Architects of Sacramento; and Kerrin West, partner in
charge of BSB Design's Sacramento division. Graham and Moniz are
licensed architects; West and Packowski are designers.
Collectively, they design suburban houses
and planned communities, urban housing and brownstone-like condos.
Going small, loving large
Moniz: That's what really has become a
problem: The size of peoples' wardrobes, all the computer equipment,
all the TVs. There's too much consumerism. I have older clients, people
right now, who want to pare down. And they're making that a real focus.
How can we fit ourselves into 1,500 square feet? ... Well, how many
special rooms do you need to watch TV in? How many things do you need
to store? How big of a wardrobe do you need? Just get rid of stuff.
Packowski: In the 1940s we started out with
the little 600-square-foot house. After World War II that was too
small. Then we're at 800, then 1,200. What's our average now?
1,800-1,900? It was 1,400 only 10 years ago.
People are really starting to have
conversations about what's going to happen to all of these big homes
we've built around here in the last 10 years. What about 10 years from
now and 15 years from now, when the people who wanted those don't want
them anymore? More importantly, the kids coming up absolutely don't
want them. What the hell are we going to do with all these houses?
Power of the flat screen
Packowski: The placement of the television
in the room now is so flexible. The television has replaced the
fireplace as the centerpoint of the rooms now. Most interior designers
will say it's one of the most challenging things to deal with from an
interior design standpoint. If the TV becomes a focal point, it's
difficult for art and things to be placed in a room.
Moniz: I still struggle with designing
rooms that have fireplaces and TVs. The flat screen has helped. You can
put it above the fireplace. I have seen some things advertised where,
magically, it looks like a piece of art and then it turns into a TV.
You can't get around it. TV is the main part of our culture. So you're
still stuck with trying to have at least one room in the house where TV
viewing is the main function. And you have to design furniture and
walls and windows so there's a spot to mount the TV.
West: The reality is there's no niches
anymore. There's no point for them. People can put TVs wherever they
need to. They'll watch movies on a laptop. They get the technology and
the viewing wherever they need to.
Solar gets a foothold
Packowski: I'm probably the only fan of
global warming that's out there right now, and I've been preaching this
for about a year. It sometimes takes crisis to bring change, and
whether it is, in fact, real or not, global warming has affected the
buyer and consumer in ways that nobody could have imagined as quickly
as it has. All of a sudden, more and more people understand what the
term LEED means (the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
green building rating system). ...
The fact that (home builder) Lennar made
the commitment to do 1,600 to 2,600 solar homes in the (Sacramento)
region is, well, the odds of that even happening is slim to none at
$15,000 a house. All of a sudden now it's becoming de facto.
http://www.sacbee.com/103/story/264492.html
|